Inalienable Rights and Wrongs
“…the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness…” are words immortalized in the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America.
These are powerful, profound words with meaning that ought to be dear to all our citizens. Because of this power and profundity we need to carefully consider any claim to a “right.” People often speak of a right to something, but just what is a right? What is the definition of the term?
There are two principles fundamental to a legitimate understanding of the way our society uses the word “right.” First, a right exists simultaneously among people. Second, a right conveys no obligation on another. Violate either of these doctrines and you are simply not dealing with a human right. Consider an example regarding the right to travel freely. I have the right to visit family in another state, but I do not have the right to demand you pay for the trip!
The Good
Basic human rights, as recognized in our Declaration of Independence, are the foundation upon which a free society is built. Establishing and defending these rights constitutes the sole purpose, entire scope, and ultimate justification for the government of the U.S.
The Bad
There is an unmistakably clear drift away from the legitimate understanding of what comprises a right. Many good, noble, important and valuable concepts simply do not belong in the “rights” category. Education, housing and health care are three prime examples.
The Ugly
Governments have no resources of their own so any dollar “reallocated” by government has been taken from another citizen. By labeling things like education or health care as “rights” we inevitably diminish the most basic right of other citizens, that being the right to do as they will with their own property (money, if you will.) No amount of rhetoric can change the fact that if someone has the right to what they did NOT earn someone else must be denied the right to what they DID earn.
So, basically, if what you consider your “right” entails someone else bearing the cost(s) whether financially, physically or in violation of their will it is not a right. PERIOD!
Thanks for reading.






Well said, Bryan. What a lot of progressive liberals classify as a right is nothing more than an attempt to give someone something for nothing. That means they will have to take it from someone else, which naturally concludes that it will be someone who has something of their own. That usually means they have worked for it. That is not a right.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jon Williford, LD Jackson. LD Jackson said: RT @desperate_state Inalienable Rights and Wrongs http://bit.ly/aNoHyo [...]
I am glad I am not young anymore. Because I do not want to see what happens when our fossile fuel oil is all gone. No matter how much we drill. At the rate we are using it up. It will all be gone. Your car you have today will only make for a good planter in your yard. No one believes it will happen. Fossile fuels will run dry.
Inalienable Rights and Wrongs http://goo.gl/fb/0uZo #tcot
This comment was originally posted on Twitter